Many folks would like to see us back on the Moon and developing its resources.

Friday, April 13, 2007

Report Reveals Likely Causes of Mars Spacecraft Loss


http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mgs/
------------------------------------------------------------
snip

WASHINGTON - After studying Mars four times as long as originally
planned, NASA's Mars Global Surveyor orbiter appears to have
succumbed to battery failure caused by a complex sequence of events
involving the onboard computer memory and ground commands.

snip
------------------------------------------------------------

I missed sending this in time for you to listen to the teleconference
but copied the report below.
- LRK -

The Discovery News clip makes a more dramatic heading with "Human Error
Caused Mars Surveyor Loss".

It is easy to get a sun burn while laying on the beach.
It is easy to overheat the shuttle if you can't open the cargo doors.
It is easy to overheat a spacecraft if you don't allow for where the Sun is.

When Pioneer 10 was launched it needed to make attitude adjustments to
point the spin axis in the direction you needed to make a Jupiter
encounter. Normally the big antenna dish would shadow the instrument
compartment if the antenna was pointing towards Earth when far away from
the Sun but in those first maneuvers after leaving earth you had thrust
vector considerations as well as antenna pointing issues, and you did
not want the instrument compartment and batteries getting blistered by
the Sun.

In a Pioneer/Jupiter News Letter issued on March 14, 1972, the title is
"PIONEER 10 DRAWS A BEAD ON JUPITER".
It mentions that on the 6th day of the mission the initial midcourse
maneuver was performed. The objectives of this maneuver were to locate
the encounter 3 radii from the center of Jupiter 14 degree below a
parallel to the ecliptic through the planet's center and time the
arrival within one of the daily 5 hour overlaps of tracking capabilities
of the 64 meter antennas at Goldstone, Calif., and at Canberra, Australia.

During reorientation of the spacecraft to earth alignment after
injection, signal dropouts were experienced in the interference region
between forward and aft (oppositely polarized) spacecraft antennas. This
restricted the alignment to within 45 degrees of earth alignment. Also
equipment compartment temperatures were near the upper design limits, so
it was preferred not to turn the spacecraft backside towards the sun
during the maneuver. They selected the maneuver strategy 48 hours after
launch and was sustained by excellent performance of the propulsion
system and JPL's measurements during calibration maneuvers during the
next 15 hours.

Sounds like fun, huh, where is Earth, where is Jupiter, where is the
Sun, where is my coffee? Oh, Oh, where is Pioneer 10?
Earth - Spacecraft Distance 8,789,2001 km
Spacecraft - Jupiter Distance 817,799,413 km

Even Lunar Prospector going to the Moon had to worry about where was the
Sun to get power to the solar panels and don't get the Sun shining on
the Alpha Particle Spectrometer bottom face as it may have gotten a
wrinkle in its Sunglasses when the trans lunar injection module pushed
itself away with its little nitrogen jets. You also had to worry about
not flying down Earth's shadow from the Sun because it was a full Moon
[Sun behind Earth, shadow looking out towards the Moon].

Want to fly a deep space mission?


Thanks for looking up with me.

Larry Kellogg

Web Site: http://lkellogg.vttoth.com/LarryRussellKellogg/
BlogSpot: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/
RSS link: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/atom.xml
Newsletter: https://news.altair.com/mailman/listinfo/lunar-update

==============================================================

April 13, 2007

Dwayne Brown
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1726

Guy Webster
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
818-354-6278

RELEASE: 07-88

REPORT REVEALS LIKELY CAUSES OF MARS SPACECRAFT LOSS

WASHINGTON - After studying Mars four times as long as originally
planned, NASA's Mars Global Surveyor orbiter appears to have
succumbed to battery failure caused by a complex sequence of events
involving the onboard computer memory and ground commands.

The causes were released today in a preliminary report by an internal
review board. The board was formed to look more in-depth into why
NASA's Mars Global Surveyor went silent in November 2006 and
recommend any processes or procedures that could increase safety for
other spacecraft.

Mars Global Surveyor last communicated with Earth on Nov. 2, 2006.
Within 11 hours, depleted batteries likely left the spacecraft unable
to control its orientation.

"The loss of the spacecraft was the result of a series of events
linked to a computer error made five months before the likely battery
failure," said board Chairperson Dolly Perkins, deputy
director-technical of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,
Md.

On Nov. 2, after the spacecraft was ordered to perform a routine
adjustment of its solar panels, the spacecraft reported a series of
alarms, but indicated that it had stabilized. That was its final
transmission. Subsequently, the spacecraft reoriented to an angle
that exposed one of two batteries carried on the spacecraft to direct
sunlight. This caused the battery to overheat and ultimately led to
the depletion of both batteries. Incorrect antenna pointing prevented
the orbiter from telling controllers its status, and its programmed
safety response did not include making sure the spacecraft
orientation was thermally safe.

The board also concluded that the Mars Global Surveyor team followed
existing procedures, but that procedures were insufficient to catch
the errors that occurred. The board is finalizing recommendations to
apply to other missions, such as conducting more thorough reviews of
all non-routine changes to stored data before they are uploaded and
to evaluate spacecraft contingency modes for risks of overheating.

"We are making an end-to-end review of all our missions to be sure
that we apply the lessons learned from Mars Global Surveyor to all
our ongoing missions," said Fuk Li, Mars Exploration Program manager
at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

Mars Global Surveyor, launched in 1996, operated longer at Mars than
any other spacecraft in history, and for more than four times as long
as the prime mission originally planned. The spacecraft returned
detailed information that has overhauled understanding about Mars.
Major findings include dramatic evidence that water still flows in
short bursts down hillside gullies, and identification of deposits of
water-related minerals leading to selection of a Mars rover landing
site.

The Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., manages Mars Global
Surveyor for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington. Lockheed
Martin Space Systems, Denver, developed and operates the spacecraft.

Information about the Mars Global Surveyor mission, including the
preliminary report from the process review board and a list of some
important discoveries by the mission, is available on the Internet
at:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mgs

EDITORS NOTE:

NASA will hold a media teleconference today at 3 p.m. EDT, to discuss
the report.

Reporters should call 1-888-398-6118 and use the pass code "Mars" to
participate in the teleconference. International media should call
1-773-681-5826. Replays of the teleconference will be available by
calling 866-369-3645. International media may call: 203-369-0243.

Audio of the teleconference will stream live at:

http://www.nasa.gov/newsaudio


-end-

To subscribe to the list, send a message to:
hqnews-subscribe@mediaservices.nasa.gov
To remove your address from the list, send a message to:
hqnews-unsubscribe@mediaservices.nasa.gov

Snip
==============================================================
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/04/13/surveyor_spa.html?category=space&guid=2
0070413140000&dcitc=w19-502-ak-0000


Human Error Caused Mars Surveyor Loss

Alicai Chang, Associated Press

*April 13, 2007* � Human error triggered a cascade of events that caused
the battery to fail on the Mars Global Surveyor last year, according to
a preliminary report released Friday.

An internal NASA board determined that power loss likely doomed the
spacecraft after a decade of meticulously mapping the Red Planet.

But the problems actually began in 2005 when a routine technical update
to onboard computers caused inconsistencies in the spacecraft's memory.
The board concluded that engineers didn't catch the mistakes because the
existing procedures to do so were inadequate.

Scientists lost contact last November with the $154 million Global
Surveyor. Launched in 1996, it was the oldest of six different active
probes on the Martian surface or circling the planet.

Snip
==============================================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK

==============================================================

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

NASA Targets June Launch for Space Shuttle Atlantis

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/main/index.html

04.10.07 - 7:45 p.m. EST
NASA is targeting June 8 as the next possible launch opportunity for space shuttle Atlantis' STS-117 mission to the International Space Station.

Tuesday’s decision by agency management followed a meeting that reviewed the progress in repairing insulating foam on the shuttle’s external fuel tank, which was damaged during a sudden hail storm Feb. 26 at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center, Fla. That damage required engineers to repair approximately 2,660 sites on the tank.
Snip
==============================================================

I hope no more ice storms.

I wonder what it will be like when you start making routine trips to the Moon.

Thanks for looking up with me.

Larry Kellogg

Web Site: http://lkellogg.vttoth.com/LarryRussellKellogg/
BlogSpot: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/
RSS link: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/atom.xml
Newsletter: https://news.altair.com/mailman/listinfo/lunar-update

==============================================================
April 10, 2007

Allard Beutel
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-4769

Kyle Herring
Johnson Space Center, Houston
281-483-5111

RELEASE: 07-83

NASA TARGETS JUNE LAUNCH FOR SPACE SHUTTLE ATLANTIS

WASHINGTON - NASA is targeting June 8 as the next possible launch
opportunity for space shuttle Atlantis' STS-117 mission to the
International Space Station.

Tuesday's decision by agency management followed a meeting that
reviewed the progress in repairing insulating foam on the shuttle's
external fuel tank, which was damaged during a sudden hail storm Feb.
26 at NASA's Kennedy Space Center, Fla. That damage required
engineers to repair approximately 2,660 sites on the tank.

The meeting also included an assessment of using the repaired external
tank for the STS-117 mission versus swapping to one that arrived last
week from the manufacturing plant in New Orleans. Managers decided to
finish repairs to Atlantis' current tank and use it for STS-117. The
tank that arrived Friday will be prepared for space shuttle
Endeavour's STS-118 mission to the space station and now is targeted
for launch in August.

"The workforce has done an amazing job of assessing and repairing the
tank so far, but the sheer volume of repairs dictates moving the
launch target to June," said Space Shuttle Program Manager Wayne
Hale.

June 8 is the opening of the next available launch window for Atlantis
to go to the station. STS-117 Commander Rick Sturckow, Pilot Lee
Archambault and mission specialists Jim Reilly, Patrick Forrester,
Steven Swanson and John "Danny" Olivas will continue training at
NASA's Johnson Space Center, Houston. During the 11-day mission, the
astronauts will work with the station crew and ground teams to
install a new, girder-like truss segment, unfold a new set of solar
arrays and retract one array on the starboard side of the station.

For more information about the STS-117 crew and mission, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/shuttle


-end-


To subscribe to the list, send a message to:
hqnews-subscribe@mediaservices.nasa.gov
To remove your address from the list, send a message to:
hqnews-unsubscribe@mediaservices.nasa.gov


Snip
==============================================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK

==============================================================

Monday, April 09, 2007

When bad launches happen to good companies

Over the last decade the commercial launch industry has experienced a series of ups and downs. The industry was doing quite well in the late 1990s, riding the telecom boom and the development of several large constellations of low Earth orbit communications satellites. The boom went bust early this decade, and the industry went into the doldrums, with a sharp drop in launch demand and even the withdrawal of vehicles like the Delta 4, which Boeing took off the commercial launch market because prices had dropped dramatically in response to the low demand. In the last couple of years, though, the market has improved, with increased demand and rising prices (see “Is the launch industry on the rebound?”, The Space Review, February 20, 2006).


Snip


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Hope Sea Launch figures out what went wrong and can launch again soon.


LRK



Thanks for looking up with me.

Larry Kellogg

Web Site: http://lkellogg.vttoth.com/LarryRussellKellogg/
BlogSpot: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/
RSS link: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/atom.xml
Newsletter: https://news.altair.com/mailman/listinfo/lunar-update

==============================================================