Many folks would like to see us back on the Moon and developing its resources.

Showing posts with label Robots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robots. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 08, 2013

Better than human - Imagine that 7 out of 10 working Americans got fired tomorrow. What would they all do?



We talk about send in the robots to do jobs in space and we have seen them used more and more in manufacturing. Does this present a problem to those looking for employment?  The type of jobs have changed over the years and change requires the ability to adapt.  Back in the 70's the term was "future shock" and Alvin Toffler wrote a book about it.

The other day I read an article in the January 2013 'WIRED" magazine about automation and robots that might do your job better than you and could replace you. The Kurzweil news letter referenced it an you can read on line.  You might be interested in some of the comments both at Kurzweil and WIRED.
- LRK -

-----------------------------------------------

Better than human

Imagine that 7 out of 10 working Americans got fired tomorrow. What would they all do?
January 2, 2013
It’s hard to believe you’d have an economy at all if you gave pink slips to more than half the labor force. But that — in slow motion — is what the industrial revolution did to the workforce of the early 19th century, says Wired maverick Kevin Kelley.
Two hundred years ago, 70 percent of American workers lived on the farm. Today automation has eliminated all but 1 percent of their jobs, replacing them (and their work animals) with machines.
But the displaced workers did not sit idle. Instead, automation created hundreds of millions of jobs in entirely new fields. Those who once farmed were now manning the legions of factories that churned out farm equipment, cars, and other industrial products.
Since then, wave upon wave of new occupations have arrived — appliance repairman, offset printer, food chemist, photographer, web designer — each building on previous automation. Today, the vast majority of us are doing jobs that no farmer from the 1800s could have imagined.
It may be hard to believe, but before the end of this century, 70 percent of today’s occupations will likewise be replaced by automation. …

snip
-----------------------------------------------

I suppose you can think of the coming future with dread and doom or check out what the possibilities for advancement might be.  Back in 1998 I bought a book that Mark Prado put together from his web site about using the resources of the Moon and Near Earth Asteroids. The website still exists with some updates and thoughts about how we are now at a point  where we could go extinct if some bioterroism act went wrong.  The CDC has an Emergency Preparedness and Response page.

Does this mean we should push for off world communities or just clean up our act here on Mother Earth?
Mark has a lot of information and thoughts if you have the time to read.
- LRK -

-----------------------------------------------

 In summary, PERMANENT is for developing outer space on a very large scale, rapidly, by using materials already in space -- asteroids near Earth and/or lunar material -- instead of expensively blasting up from Earth all the materials used in space.After all, the Europeans who settled America didn't bring their bricks and cement from Europe...

This is an urgent matter for the survival of the human race because we have advanced technologically to the point in time where we can create new biological agents which could be suddenly lethal to all humans on Earth such as a supervirus, as well as nanotechnology which could kill all humans and possibly wreak havoc to the biosphere as we know it.
snip
-----------------------------------------------

So you have decided to help build a lunar base.  I suggest you take a look at the contract and read the fine print.
- LRK -

-----------------------------------------------
Welcome To Moonbase
by  Ben Bova

-From Publishers Weekly

With the premise that man returns to the moon in 1999 and establishes a permanent base there by 2020, science fiction author and editor Bova here fashions an intriguing "manual" for pioneers arriving at the lunar community. With 50 detailed illustrations by NASA artist Rawlings, the guidebook covers Moonbase history, architecture, ecology, transportation, science projects, jobs, training, industries, tourism, sports ("lunar jai alai"), entertainment, day-to-day life, duties, rights and laws: "No one is allowed to walk on the surface alone, except in the specially marked 'Moonwalk Lanes.' " Combining fact and fiction in this "future history," Bova presents a compelling and persuasive argument for mankind's continual exploration of the moon and the establishment of a base on the lunar surface.
Copyright 1987 Reed Business Information, Inc.

snip
-----------------------------------------------

Well, while I am awake, I will watch, and wonder. :-)
- LRK -

MOONRISE
Ben Bova

A review by Steven H Silver

Ben Bova's corporate science fiction epic, Moonrise, is a retelling of the same technophobic themes which date back to Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Whereas Shelly's societal demons were the sciences of anatomy and biology, Bova's monster takes the form of the emerging science of nanotechnology.

On its surface, Moonrise chronicles Masterson Aerospace's tenure on the moon. In fact, Bova is looking at the soap operatic escapades of the dysfunctional, yet co-dependant Masterson family. At the head of the clan is Joanna Masterson Stavenger, who takes maternal instinct to an unhealthy extreme and loses all her common and business sense where her offspring are concerned. Strong and competent in the business world, Joanna disintegrates to little more than a quivering mass in private.

snip
==============================================================
The Moon - Resources, Future Development, and Settlement

Reviewed by: Gordon Woodcock
Reprinted from Ad Astra Summer 2008

Title: The Moon: Resources, Future Development, and Settlement, 2nd Edition
Author: David Schrunk, Burton Sharpe, Bonnie Cooper, and Madhu Thangavelu

The Moon is a broad-scoped treatment of future lunar development, with a lot of technical information in an easy-to-read style. Outlining the Moon’s historical explorations as well as bold and forward-thinking future concepts, this book is an interesting read for all different types of Earth-bound lunar enthusiasts.

snip 
==============================================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK -

==============================================================

Saturday, September 04, 2010

To The Moon - well send in the Avatar - the robots - the game simulation

Since we don't seem to be in any hurry to send humans back to the Moon for real, I have been spending my time in my own dreams of human like robots that can think and are intelligent.
- LRK -

-----------------------------------------
http://www.amazon.com/Artificial-Life-Overview-Christopher-Langton/dp/0262121891
Artificial Life: An Overview [Hardcover]
Christopher G. Langton (Editor)

Product Description
Artificial life, a field that seeks to increase the role of synthesis in the study of biological phenomena, has great potential, both for unlocking the secrets of life and for raising a host of disturbing issues -- scientific and technical as well as philosophical and ethical. This book brings together a series of overview articles that appeared in the first three issues of the groundbreaking journal Artificial Life, along with a new introduction by Christopher Langton, Editor-in-Chief of Artificial Life, founder of the discipline, and Director of the Artificial Life Program at the Santa Fe Institute.

snip
-----------------------------------------

You may have watched the movie AVATAR (2009) and wondered what it would be like to be able to put yourself into an immersion chamber and experience what a synthetic life form would experience.  Could we do the same for sending a NON Human to the Moon, since sending Human Humans seems to be questionable?
- LRK -

-----------------------------------------
http://www.fandango.com/avatar2009_103067/movieoverview
 Avatar (2009)
 Opened December 18, 2009 | Runtime:2 hr. 30 min.

AVATAR takes us to a spectacular world beyond imagination, where a reluctant hero embarks on an epic adventure, ultimately fighting to save the alien world he has learned to call home. James Cameron, the Oscar-winning director of “Titanic,” first  conceived the film 15 years ago, when the means to realize his vision did not exist yet.  Now, after four years of production, AVATAR, a live action film with a new generation of special effects, delivers a fully immersive cinematic experience of a new kind, where the revolutionary technology invented to make the film disappears into the emotion of the characters and the sweep of the story.

snip
-----------------------------------------

It looks like we will have to rely on satellite lunar orbiters to show us the Moon and hopefully at least some rovers on the lunar surface to begin to let us know more about our  nearest neighbor in space. Sending real live, thinking intelligent explorers there seems to be a long way off and I don't have that much time to wait.  I hope our Congress makes up its mind soon as to how we will proceed.  In the mean time I guess we will be at the mercy of simulations.
- LRK -

-----------------------------------------
http://www.moonbasealphagame.com/
Do you have what it takes ...

In ‘Moonbase Alpha’, players will step into the role of an exploration team member and will be immersed in a futuristic 3D lunar settlement. Their mission is to restore critical systems and oxygen flow after a nearby meteor strike cripples a solar array and life support equipment. Available resources include an interactive  command center, a lunar rover, mobile robotic repair units and a fully stocked equipment shed.

This 'First Person Explorer' serious game includes both a single player capability and LAN or internet multiplayer gameplay for up to six active players on a team. Selectable maps will be available for specific player numbers (e.g., 2 player map, 4 player map, etc.).  Each of these maps is represented and tracked individually within the game’s leader boards.

snip
-----------------------------------------
http://store.steampowered.com/app/39000/
http://www.gamingbits.com/general-gaming-news-bits/nasas-moonbase-alpha-game-launches-on-steam-today-gameplay-preview/

A Popular Mechanics review of the program is not too supportive.
- LRK -

-----------------------------------------
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/gadgets/video-games/why-nasas-new-video-game-completely-misses-the-point
Why NASA's New Video Game Completely Misses the Point
August 3, 2010 3:30 PM

There is a scene in last year's first-person shooter, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2,  that puts you in the pressurized boots of an astronaut. While hitched to the outside of the International Space Station, you're asked by mission control to provide visual confirmation of an ICBM arcing through low Earth orbit. The sequence ends as abruptly as it begins, with the station blown to pieces, and you, the astronaut, sent tumbling into space. It's a bizarre and thrilling minute of doomed gameplay.

If only NASA's own astronaut simulator, Moonbase Alpha, was so brutish and short. Distributed for free online (via the Steam network) and developed in partnership with America's Army, the PC game is set on a lunar outpost in 2025. After a meteor strike disables the expedition's life-support systems, one or more players set out with tools, robots and rovers to get oxygen flowing again. It's a race against the clock—25 minutes, to be precise.
  
It's also excruciatingly boring, not to mention ill-timed. This past April, after hearing the recommendations of an independent panel on the future of human spaceflight, the Obama administration pulled the plug on a new manned mission to the moon. "We've been there before. Buzz has been there before," President Obama said during a speech on April 15 at the John F. Kennedy Center in Florida, referring to Buzz Aldrin, who attended the event. "There's a lot more of space to explore, and a lot more to learn when we do."

What Obama didn't mention was that Aldrin was one of the most vocal critics of NASA's return trip to the moon, advising instead a robot-only lunar presence for the United States, while concentrating on manned expeditions to Mars and its moons. Even those experts in favor of a lunar outpost saw it as little more than a logistical necessity—a place to mine for fuel and launch missions into deep space.

snip
-----------------------------------------
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1657/1

For you who would prefer to go to Mars, well we have a lot of data on Mars now and you can explore on your own.
- LRK -

-----------------------------------------
http://beamartian.jpl.nasa.gov/welcome
 NASA Be A Martian - Welcome

Age of Virtual Exploration & the Human-Robotic Partnership

I want to be a Martian Citizen. >  Account Set Up
I just want to look around. > Anonymous Tourist Visa
I am a Martian Citizen.

This site was created under a Memorandum of Understanding between NASA/JPL-Caltech and Microsoft.
snip
-----------------------------------------

OK, forgive me, but I am going back to my reading and day dreaming.

Thanks for looking up with me.
- LRK -

Web Site: http://lkellogg.vttoth.com/LarryRussellKellogg/
BlogSpot: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/
Comments accepted here - http://lunar-update.blogspot.com/
RSS link: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/atom.xml
Newsletter: https://news.altair.com/mailman/listinfo/lunar-update
==============================================================
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/engineering/robots/4344855

Robonaut2 Shows Real Workplace Potential For Humanoid Robots GM and NASA unveil the latest upgrades to the torso-bot, Robonaut2 (R2). The new R2 shows off impressive design, flexes complex abilities and, finally, brings real-world job skills—in the factory or at the space station—to the humanoid bot. 
By Erik Sofge
February 4, 2010 12:00 AM

For all the attention they get, humanoid robots tend to be a pretty shallow bunch. Honda's Asimo  dances, shakes hands, and occasionally serves tea. Toyota's series of Partner Robots can play musical instruments and guide visitors around one of the carmaker's facilities in Japan. A range of less famous models in labs  round the world grab headlines by gripping objects without destroying them, or walking a few steps without tipping onto their extremely expensive heads.  Humanoid bots are the celebrities of the robot world.

Which is why the unveiling this morning of Robonaut2—or R2—a collaboration between General Motor and NASA's Johnson Space Center, is such a milestone. R2 is the direct descendant of Robonaut, a humanoid model designed by NASA to assist astronauts during spacewalks (or extravehicular activities; EVAs, as the agency calls them), planetary exploration or any mission that could use an extra pair of dextrous hands. NASA intentionally avoided the complex, expensive business of two-legged mobility, instead fitting the robot with a single leg, designed to fit into the foot-restraints used by astronauts during EVAs. The robot could also be mounted, Centaur-like, on a wheeled platform. Robonaut never made it into space, but starting in 2007, General Motors embedded a team of their engineers with the existing Robonaut team at Johnson Space Center in Houston, to help design the robot's successor. GM also provided funding for the project, a move that, given NASA's current budgetary reshuffling, could be visionary in hindsight.

So why, exactly, would an embattled automaker devote its dwindling resources to a robot designed to clamber around spacecraft or motor across other planets? For the same reason GM has always been interested in robots: to build cars. "We had a common agenda with NASA," says Allen Taub, vice president of global research and development at GM. "They wanted to make a robot that could work next to an astronaut," he says. "The question we wanted to answer was, 'How do I make a robot so it can work with operators, without all of the safety precautions and cages?'" As they go through their automated routines, industrial assembly bots are inherently dangerous to be around. And according to Taub, installing cages and other safety measures often costs more than the robot itself. "This robot can be going through its paces, and if you just hold your hand up, it hits your hand and stops," he says

snip
==============================================================
http://www.pars3c.com/2010/07/11/review-moonbase-alpha/
Review: Moonbase Alpha
July 11, 2010  Elizabeth Howell

All that’s missing from this lunar experience is that gunpowder-smell of regolith the Apollo astronauts reported when they returned to their spacecraft.

Moonbase Alpha is a game created by Learning Technologies, an educational-technology incubator within NASA. (There is apparently no relation to the Space:1999 Moonbase Alpha.)

The aim of the program is to complement science, technology, engineering and mathematics education in the schools and present NASA’s work in a way that engages with young people. LT is also making forays into Second Life and creating another game, Astronaut: Moon, Mars and Beyond.

What’s astounding is the amount of stuff Moonbase gets right about landing on the lunar surface. Astronauts have that same floaty-falling walk you’re used to seeing in the Apollo missions. There’s a fierce glare when staring straight at the sun, and the dust covers everything from the rovers to the astronauts. The mission is to restore the oxygen flow at a NASA lunar outpost after a meteor strike heavily damages the base. Single players or teams of up to six people can work on solving the problem using rovers, wrenches, welders and some spare tools loaded in an equipment shack on the moon.

There’s a competitive mode if you feel like challenging yourself to complete the repair in 25 minutes; after two tries in non-competitive mode I knew I was nowhere near beating the mark. My first attempt ran 90 minutes as I fumbled around the base, tangling robots in hoses and occasionally getting lost. My second was a more respectable 38.

snip
==============================================================
http://www.hobbyspace.com/Simulators/index.html
Space Simulators
Like being there...

A space simulator can be as simple as a spacecraft simulation program running on your PC or as elaborate as a detailed, full scale hardware simulation of a shuttle cockpit.

Or perhaps it's a large scale group simulation carried out over the internet in which the participants play different roles, e.g. mission controllers or astronauts, in carrying out a mission scenario such as launching a satellite from the shuttle.

This section provides links and descriptions of all sorts of web resources related to both software and hardware space simulations.

snip
==============================================================
http://www.amazon.com/Creation-Life-Make-Steve-Grand/dp/0674011139/  [Paperback]
http://www.amazon.com/Creation-Life-Make-Steve-Grand/dp/0674006542/  [Hardcover]
Creation: Life and How to Make It
Steve Grand

Amazon.com Review
Though its title brings to mind the hubris of Frankenstein, Steve
Grand's Creation: Life and How to Make It is just humble enough to
keep its readers hooked. Best known as the developer of the Creatures
series of artificial-life software, Grand has quite a following among
devotees of playful complexity.

The book ranges from deep ruminations on the nature of life and mind
(artificial and biological) to fairly concrete advice for future
creators, and his writing is just as elegant and compelling as his
software. Sometimes his cleverness gets the best of him, but for the
most part, his wordplay is used to serve his ideas, which are
thought-provoking even for readers who have no intention of creating
life.

Many will be surprised at the strength of Grand's antireductionism,
but he makes his case vigorously and may win a few converts to the
emergent-phenomena camp. Creation is essential reading for those of us
who want to think through the consequences of our actions before we
imitate Frankenstein's mistake. --Rob Lightner

snip
==============================================================
http://stevegrand.wordpress.com/category/artificial-life/page/4/
http://stevegrand.wordpress.com/category/artificial-life/page/3/
http://stevegrand.wordpress.com/category/artificial-life/page/2/
http://stevegrand.wordpress.com/category/artificial-life/
http://stevegrand.wordpress.com/

Steve Grand's Blog
Artificial Life in Real Life

snip
==============================================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK

==============================================================

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

Lunar Base Construction Robots - Will they be intelligent?

Folks have been thinking about this for some time.
How close to the science fiction stories do you think they will get?
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------------------
http://www.spacedaily.com/spacenet/text/lunar-b.html
Japan Space Net
Talk About Lunar Base Getting Serious

Once simply the fodder for science-fiction stories, building a base on the moon is now being looked at in earnest by Japan.

Tokyo -- December 19,1996 -- Recently some 170 of the world's top space scientists, engineers and mission specialists attending the Second International Lunar Workshop in Kyoto, debating not only an extensive scientific re-exploration of the lunar landscape, but the setting up of a permanent manned presence within thirty years.

Speaker after speaker talked of the scientific and technical benefits to be accrued from exploring the moon. Some pointed to the huge tasks ahead developing critical technology needed even to get there again. But while the problem of raising finance was conveniently skipped during the five day confab, one topic dominated discussions; how to build a lunar base.

snip
---------------------------------------------------------

Nine years later, still a topic of interest.
- LRK -
___________________________________________
http://www.pcworld.com/article/121442/japan_dreams_of_robot_moon_base_in_2025.html
Japan Dreams of Robot Moon Base in 2025
Advanced humanoid robots could take over mining, telescope-building chores for humans.
Paul Kallender, IDG News Service
Jun 20, 2005 1:00 am

TOKYO -- Japan wants to help build a lunar base and populate it with advanced versions of today's humanoid robots by around 2025, according to the head of the nation's space agency.

The idea is more than a pipe-dream; it is part of a 20-year plan, called JAXA Vision 2025, that was drawn up by Keiji Tachikawa, a former president of Japan's largest mobile operator NTT DoCoMo, who is now president of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency(JAXA).

As part of the plan, Japan would use advanced robotic technologies to help build the moon base, while redeveloped versions of today's humanoid robots, such as Honda Motor's Asimo and Sony's Qrio, could work in the moon's inhospitable environment in place of astronauts, he said in a recent interview.

Japan's lunar robots would do work such as building telescopes and prospecting and mining for minerals, Tachikawa said.
"I see a big role for Japan's robotics technologies on the moon," he said. "Japanese robots will be one of our big contributions. If there is work where robots can replace humans, they will."

U.S. Also Interested
Tachikawa's plan follows a January 2004 decision by U.S. President George W. Bush that the U.S., with the assistance of partners including Japan, should build a lunar base by about 2020 and use it as a staging point for the human exploration of Mars.
The plan has struck a chord in Japan, which has long harbored dreams of building such a base

snip
---------------------------------------------------------

and now four years later again, robots to go to the Moon.
What kind of robots would colonize the Moon?
- LRK -
---------------------------------------------------------
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/gadgets_and_gaming/article6032128.ece
From The Times
April 4, 2009
One step for a robot, a giant leap for tin-mankind
Leo Lewis in Tokyo
The cutting-edge models can lumber around a room without falling over. A few can play the trumpet or serve tea. The truly sophisticated ones can just about manage the washing-up.
But by 2020, Japan predicts, humanoid robots will be ready to colonise the Moon. Other metallic brethren of these mechanical pioneers, said scientists in Tokyo, will be engaged in the bigger, more prosaic mission of cleaning Earth’s orbit of junk.
---------------------------------------------------------

If we think that a robot might be intelligent, what would that mean?
When you hear the word "Robot" what image does that bring up:
- LRK -
---------------------------------------------------------
http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/groups/intelligent-robotics/
Intelligent Robotics

The NASA Ames Intelligent Robotics Group (IRG) is dedicated to enabling humans and robots to explore and learn about extreme environments, remote locations, and uncharted worlds. IRG conducts applied research in a wide range of areas with an emphasis on robotics systems science and field testing. IRG's expertise includes applied computer vision (navigation, 3D surface modeling, automated science support), human-robot interaction, mobile manipulation, interactive 3D visualization, and robot software architecture.

IRG maintains and operates a variety of robot hardware, including fifteen "Personal Exploration Rovers" (low-cost, educational mobile robots), the K9 planetary rover (based on a JPL FIDO chassis), four K10 planetary rovers, and dexterous manipulators (Amtec Schunk arms and Barrett grippers). IRG's research facilities include the Marscape (3,000 sq. meter outdoor rover test facility and Mars surface analog) and the Moonscape (250 sq. meter indoor rover test facility with high-precision optical tracking).

We firmly believe that collaboration is an essential part of modern research, which improves quality and speeds technology transfer. Thus, we are presently working on joint projects with partners from academia, government, and industry.

snip
---------------------------------------------------------

or do you just want to get some job done and a colony of robots much like an ant colony would be enough?
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------------------
http://www.journal.univagora.ro/download/pdf/261.pdf
Int. J. of Computers, Communications & Control, ISSN 1841-9836, E-ISSN 1841-9844
Vol. III (2008), Suppl. issue: Proceedings of ICCCC 2008, pp. 92-107
Colony of robots: New Challenge
Workshop invited key lecture
Gastón Lefranc

Abstract: The evolution on Robotics has in a cross way of application. For one side is
the applications to manufacturing, other one is application to medicine, another one in space
exploration and it is starting home applications. It is very popular to have contest of robots
for students, motivating very well to student, supported by universities, achieving good image
for the institutions.
One way for mobile robots is Nomad, a nice application for having new knowledge in the
space, but the inversion it is very expense and complex. If it has problem or fail, all the work
will stop. Instead of that, if you use a community of robots, working like a society of insect, it
is possible to have simpler mobile robots to have specific tasks, less expensive, more reliable
to reach the same aims.
In this presentation is focusing in colony of robots. This implies to merge several disciplines
based on models of communities, to have control of a society of robots working together in a
collaborative and cooperative way in non structured environments.
Keywords: Multi-robots, Colony of robots, Multiagents Systems

snip
---------------------------------------------------------

If you think your robot should be intelligent, would you mean that it should have the ability to acquire and use knowledge?

And by knowledge, you mean that it should be able to organize information?
Would you want it to be able to communicate, that is transfer its knowledge?
Should it have intuition, that is built in knowledge.

How would it acquire knowledge?
Have feelings, that is experience sensory input.
Should it have perception, the ability to transform sensations into knowledge?

What about being able to reason, applying logic to thinking.
Oh, should it be able to think, analyze what it imagined.
Aaah, have imagination, that is be able to visualize, model and devise simulations.

And lets be scarry, should it be aware, that is have knowledge of the world (Moon) situation.
Should it show emotion, that is have value judgment, evaluation of good and bad.
Lastly, throw in some consciousness, the ability to include self in the world model.

---------------------------------------------------------
http://www.james-albus.org/interest.htm
snip
A PowerPoint presentation of the potential impact of intelligent machines on science, economics, military strength, and human well being can be found here:
http://www.james-albus.org/Engineering%20of%20Mind3.ppt [116 KB, 22 slides - LRK -]
snip
---------------------------------------------------------
http://www.amazon.com/Engineering-Mind-Introduction-Science-Intelligent/dp/0471438545
Engineering of Mind: An Introduction to the Science of Intelligent Systems (Hardcover)
Presenting a reference model architecture for the design of intelligent systems
Engineering of Mind presents the foundations for a computational theory of intelligence. It discusses the main streams of investigation that will eventually converge in a scientific theory of mind and proposes an avenue of research that might best lead to the development of truly intelligent systems.
snip
---------------------------------------------------------

Will be interesting to see just what kind of robots go to the Moon.
- LRK -

Some added links below from 1990 until 2009.
What kind of robot would you like to have helping you colonize the Moon?

Thanks for looking up with me.

Larry Kellogg

Web Site: http://lkellogg.vttoth.com/LarryRussellKellogg/
BlogSpot: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/
RSS link: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/atom.xml
Newsletter: https://news.altair.com/mailman/listinfo/lunar-update
==============================================================
*http://tinyurl.com/ckess3
*

*Lunar base construction robots*
Brooks, R.A.; Maes, P.; Mataric, M.J.; More, G.
Intelligent Robots and Systems apos;90. apos;Towards a New Frontier of Applicationsapos;, Proceedings. IROS apos;90. IEEE International Workshop on
Volume , Issue , 3-6 Jul 1990 Page(s):389 - 392 vol.1
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/IROS.1990.262415
*Summary:*President Bush called for the construction of a permanently manned lunar base. All serious plans for such a base require the use of lunar soil as shielding material against the Sun's radiation. Plans rely on the use of a large bulldozer-like vehicle to be driven by an astronaut, either locally or under teleoperation control. Brooks and Flynn (89) proposed an alternate approach to a single large and complex robot based on many small totally autonomous robots which trade off time to achieve the task with lowered complexity and cost of the system. In this paper the authors describe an experimental system they are building with 20 small bulldozers, which work without explicit coordination or communication, but nevertheless cooperate to achieve tasks that will be useful in building a manned lunar base. In particular the authors believe such tasks as digging out trenches in which the habitation units will be placed, stockpiling a supply of loose lunar soil to cover the habitation units, and actually covering them when delivered, can all be carried out by such small bulldozers

» View citation and abstract

==============================================================
http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU05/10554/EGU05-J-10554.pdf
Robotic evolution for the Human Lunar Base

Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 7, 10554, 2005
SRef-ID: 1607-7962/gra/EGU05-A-10554
© European Geosciences Union 2005

K. Matsumoto, S. Wakabayashi, T. Hoshino, K. Matsumoto
ISTA/JAXA (matumoto@chofu.jaxa.jp / 81-422-40-3146)

The human lunar base and human lunar exploration is going to be the next world wide
space exploration target, after 30 years absence. In these 30 years, many technologies
have been drastically advanced, especially in the robotics, computers, artificial
intelligence, communications, and so on.

In consideration of the too severe lunar environment, such as the night temperature,
space radiation, and so on, before the human base, the full utilization of those robotic
technologies will be implemented and developed to support and build the safe, reliable,
and affordable human lunar base.

In this presentation, we will discuss and propose the stepwise evolution scenario to
the safe human lunar base, from the view points of robotic technologies. These steps
will start with the international robotic village by the virtual collaboration, as the first
step, and will reach the international human lunar base with many assistant and support
robot systems as the lunar base infrastructure. Those robot systems will be large
scale construction robot for the lunar base assembly, geological sample assembly robot
for in-site resource utilization, maintenance and repair robot of the lunar base itself,
assembly and maintenance of the scientific equipments with delicate fingers or end
effectors, and so on. These lunar base robots will be the next generation space robots
after the ISS space robots and rover robots on the Mars.

snip
==============================================================
http://www.ri.cmu.edu/publication_view.html?pub_id=5672
Crew/Robot Coordinated Planetary EVA Operations at a Lunar Base Analog Site

M. Diftler, R. Ambrose, W. Bluethmann, F. Delgado, E. Herrera, J. Kosmo, B. Janoiko, B. Wilcox, J. Townsend, J. Matthews, Terrence W. Fong, M. Bualat, S. Y. Lee, John Dorsey, and W. Doggett

38th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, March, 2007.

Download
* Adobe portable document format (pdf) (626KB)
http://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/pub4/diftler_m_2007_1/diftler_m_2007_1.pdf

Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Abstract
Under the direction of NASA's Exploration Technology Development Program, robots and space suited subjects from several NASA centers recently completed a very successful demonstration of coordinated activities indicative of base camp operations on the lunar surface. For these activities, NASA chose a site near Meteor Crater, Arizona close to where Apollo Astronauts previously trained. The main scenario demonstrated crew returning from a planetary EVA (extra-vehicular activity) to a temporary base camp and entering a pressurized rover compartment while robots performed tasks in preparation for the next EVA. Scenario tasks included: rover operations under direct human control and autonomous modes, crew ingress and egress activities, autonomous robotic payload removal and stowage operations under both local control and remote control from Houston, and autonomous robotic navigation and inspection. In addition to the main scenario, participants had an opportunity to explore additional robotic operations: hill climbing, maneuvering heaving loads, gathering geological samples, drilling, and tether operations. In this analog environment, the suited subjects and robots experienced high levels of dust, rough terrain, and harsh lighting.

Notes
Text Reference
M. Diftler, R. Ambrose, W. Bluethmann, F. Delgado, E. Herrera, J. Kosmo, B. Janoiko, B. Wilcox, J. Townsend, J. Matthews, Terrence W. Fong, M. Bualat, S. Y. Lee, John Dorsey, and W. Doggett, "Crew/Robot Coordinated Planetary EVA Operations at a Lunar Base Analog Site," 38th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, March, 2007.
snip

- LRK -
Participants: Two suited subjects, four robots and a pressurized rover compartment participated in the demonstration. The Johnson Space Center provided the two space suits and the suit subjects, the two person SCOUT (Science Crew Operations and Utility Testbed) rover, and the dexterous humanoid Centaur robot. The K-10 robot from the Ames Research Center performed inspection activities and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory ATHLETE (All-Terrain Hex-Limbed Extra-Terrestrial Explorer) robot maneuvered and supported a pressurized rover compartment provided by the Langley Research Center.

snip
==============================================================
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080614180350.htm
ScienceDaily (June 16, 2008) — Conditions on the moon will be harsher, but prototype NASA robotic vehicles braved sand storms and unprecedented temperature swings this month on sand dunes near Moses Lake, Wash., to prepare for future lunar expeditions. Teams from seven NASA centers and several universities conducted the tests from June 2-13.

"The goal was to gain hands-on experience with specific technical challenges anticipated when humans return to the moon by 2020, begin to explore the lunar surface, and set up outposts," said Test Director Bill Bluethmann of NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston.

NASA's Human Robotic Systems Project, part of the agency's Exploration Technology Development Program, focused on human and robotic mobility systems for the moon, but also looked at communication and command and control systems that will connect the explorers with Earth and each other. The Moses Lake dunes provided a wide variety of soil consistencies and terrain that allowed the team to put prototype scout robots, rovers, cargo carriers, cranes and spacesuits through tests in a harsh and changing environment.

snip
==============================================================
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090225132353.htm
Small Robots Can Prepare Lunar Surface For NASA Outpost

ScienceDaily (Mar. 2, 2009) — Small robots the size of riding mowers could prepare a safe landing site for NASA’s Moon outpost, according to a NASA-sponsored study prepared by Astrobotic Technology Inc. with technical assistance from Carnegie Mellon University’s Robotics Institute.

Astrobotic Technology and Carnegie Mellon researchers analyzed mission requirements and developed the design for an innovative new type of small lunar robot under contract from NASA’s Lunar Surface Systems group.

The results will be presented February 27 in Washington, D.C., at a NASA Lunar Surface Systems conference co-sponsored by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its Space Enterprise Council.

“NASA faces a challenge in planning the layout for its outpost, which is expected to begin operations in 2020,” said William “Red” Whittaker, chairman and chief technical officer of Astrobotic and a Carnegie Mellon professor of robotics. “For efficient cargo transfer, the landing site needs to be close to the outpost’s crew quarters and laboratories. Each rocket landing and takeoff, however, will accelerate lunar grit outwards from the pad. With no atmosphere to slow it down, the dry soil would sandblast the outpost.”

snip
==============================================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK

==============================================================