Many folks would like to see us back on the Moon and developing its resources.

Monday, August 17, 2009

Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee

Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee - Contact the Committee by E-Mail or Postal Mail
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.nasa.gov/offices/hsf/home/maildocument.html
Email a Document
hq-humanspaceflight@mail.nasa.gov
*Please state if documents submitted via e-mail may be used publicly.
**If you do not have email configured on your computer
simply copy and paste the email into your preferred email software.

Mailing Address
Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee
NASA Headquarters
300 E St SW
Washington DC 20024-3210
*Please state if documents submitted via mail may be used publicly.
snip
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you want to add your word and weight to the commission's report then best do so quickly as they are wrapping up.
- LRK -

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.nasa.gov/offices/hsf/related_documents/what-the-committee-is-doing.html
08.14.2009 - Today, Norm Augustine and the committee members met with OSTP and NASA senior management. It was basically a recapitulation and honing of what was presented in the public session on Wednesday, August 12. As we have advertised, this committee was governed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the members took that charge seriously. OSTP/NASA got essentially what the public got on Wednesday. The next step is to prepare the final report which will add more depth and text around what was presented and decided on Wednesday, but it will contain all the same primary messages. Report availability date is TBD.
08.14.2009 - The public meeting on Wednesday went very well, albeit longer than we anticipated. The members fully discussed and deliberated on all the options under consideration for human space flight. They described and discussed the options, the financial considerations for each option, and the evaluation criteria for assessing each option. Then, they down selected the options and discussed all of the evaluation criteria applicable to each option, including scoring them."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course one can sit back and just watch and see who will be the first to set up a Lunar Base and start manufacturing plants.
- LRK -

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/08/11/330691/the-bears-stars-shine-brighter.html

DATE:11/08/09
SOURCE:Flight International

The Bear's stars shine brighter
By Rob Coppinger
As the first decade of the 21st century comes to a close the nation that sent the first man into space is planning a new crewed spacecraft for lunar and International Space Station missions, all in the wake of a tumultuous period of decline, stagnation and commercial rebirth.
Before 2005 the situation had been grim for the Russian space programme. The two government five-year plans that ran from 1991 to 2000 had little funding, and the 2001-5 plan saw the industry struggle with inadequate cashflow, achieving just 40% of its objectives and with only 73% of the necessary financing provided. In 2005 the Russian Federal Space Agency announced its first ever Rb305 billion ($9.77 billion) 10-year plan for 2006 to 2015.
While it set out Moon, Mars and Venus missions and human spaceflight ambitions, it was largely about restoring and enhancing Russia's space-based infrastructure. This infrastructure is meteorological, Earth observation and telecommunication networks of spacecraft and ground stations.
And then, perhaps with an eye to the 50th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik in October 2007, Russian Federal Space Agency head Anatoly Perminov announced on 31 August of that year a 30-year vision with greater ambition. This vision includes Moon bases and a manned Mars mission in the 2035 timeframe.
snip

The decisions that Obama's government makes could lead to Russia being a primary beneficiary, with an increased need for NASA to purchase crew transport.
For a nation whose space industry struggled so much 10 years ago, the next decade will see it prosper from its international co-operation, delivering partnerships that could see a Russian boot on the Moon by 2030.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Foot prints in time, wish they were mine.
- LRK -

Thanks for looking up with me.

Larry Kellogg

Web Site: http://lkellogg.vttoth.com/LarryRussellKellogg/
BlogSpot: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/
RSS link: http://kelloggserialreports.blogspot.com/atom.xml
Newsletter: https://news.altair.com/mailman/listinfo/lunar-update
Twitter: http://twitter.com/lrkellogg
==============================================================
Info on e-mail address and snail mail address and links to some of the posts. - LRK -
http://www.nasa.gov/offices/hsf/home/maildocument.html

Email a Document
hq-humanspaceflight@mail.nasa.gov
*Please state if documents submitted via e-mail may be used publicly.

Mailing Address
Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee
NASA Headquarters
300 E St SW
Washington DC 20024-3210
*Please state if documents submitted via mail may be used publicly.

Public-Submitted Documents
- ABC Radio Commentary-1991 (pdf, 107k)
- America at the Threshold America's Space Exploration Initiative (Synthesis Group) - Executive Summary (pdf, 835k)
- Applying a Macro-Economic Analysis to Space Policy (pdf, 943k)
- Everyone's going to the Moon (pdf, 34k)
- A Goal For the Human Spaceflight Program (pdf, 116k)
- Letter from Senator Mitch McConnell (pdf, 9.5MB)
- Letter to Augustine Committee (doc, 47k) - submitted by Jeff Woytach
- HERRO: A Science-Oriented Strategy for Crewed Missions Beyond LEO (pdf, 480k) - Submitted by George R. Schmidt, PhD, PE
- Humans to Mars: Logical Step or Dangerous Distraction? (pdf, 339k) - Submitted by James A. Vedda, Ph.D.
- Comment for the Augustine Commission June 2nd 2009 (doc, 34k) - Submitted by Amalie Sinclair
- The moon as a stepping stone for a spacefaring civilization (pdf, 500k) - Submitted by Dr. rer. nat. Kai Multhaup
- Supporting Slide for The moon as a stepping stone for a spacefaring civilization (jpg, 93k) - Submitted by Dr. rer. nat. Kai Multhaup
- A role for public participation in space exploration planning and policy making (doc, 31k) - Submitted by Linda Billings, Ph.D.
- A Perpetual Space Station (doc, 36k) - Submitted by Dick Jacobson
- 21st Century Space (pdf, 63k) - Submitted by Thomas Lee Elifritz
- NASA Solicitation JSC-COTS-2 (pdf, 169k) - Submitted by Thomas Lee Elifritz
- Human Space Flight - A New Direction (pdf, 103k) - Submitted by Thomas Lee Elifritz
- Creating a Sustainable Manned Space Flight Program (pdf, 193k) - Submitted by Michael Patrick O'Hara
- Commercial Lunar Robotics to Enhance Human Exploration (doc, 36k) - Submitted by John Kohut, CEO Astrobotic Technology, Inc.
- A Lunar Surface Rendezvous (LSR) Architecture Proposal (pdf, 332k) - Submitted by Daniel R. Adamo
- A Letter to the President concerning the Promise and Challenge of Space (doc, 53k) - Submitted by Alex Michael Bonnici
- Letter to Review of Human Spaceflight Committee (pdf, 102k) - Submitted by Marion Blakey, Aerospace Industries Association
- The Role of Space in Addressing America's National Priorities (pdf, 3.63MB) - Submitted by Aerospace Industries Association
- Did you see the weather report for this world? (doc, 31k) - Submitted by Brent Morgan
- Recommendations to the Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee (rtf, 13k) - Submitted by Hans L.D.G. Starlife
- NASA World Tree (png, 347k) - Submitted by Hans L.D.G. Starlife
- Letter to the Committee (txt, 2k) - Submitted by O Glenn Smith NASA/JSC retired
- Suggestions For The U. S. Human Space Flight Plan (doc, 38k) - Submitted by Arthur M. Collins, Retired Aerospace Engineer
- Managing environmental impact of space flight, alternate Ares V architecture to NASA June 2008 recommendation and changes to Ares I first stage (doc, 1.34MB) - Submitted by Peter Egan
- The Global Space Administration (GSA) (doc, 87k) - Submitted by Miguel Cooper
- Requirements for Manned Space Flights to Mars: Should NASA Skip Returning to the Moon? (pdf, 16k) - Submitted by Nickolaus E. Leggett, Analyst
- Man on Mars by 2019 using 3 Shuttles (pdf, 32k) - Submitted by Michael J. Coppi,
- Depot-Centric Human Spaceflight (pdf, 103k) - Submitted by Jonathan Goff
- Briefing for Political/National Leaders on Options Available for the US Space Program (pdf, 2MB) - Submitted by Michael Brazelton
- What are the appropriate destinations and sequences of exploration for human exploration beyond LEO (docx, 16k) - Submitted by Gary Kitmacher
- Letter to the Committee (pdf, 15k) - Submitted by Eric Christiansen
- Propellantless Space Travel Using Recycled Kinetic Energy (pdf, 733k) - Submitted by Phil Turek
- Impulse Engine (pptx, 2.8MB) - Submitted by Phil Turek
- Explore Our Stepping Stone - First Understand What The Moon Offers (pdf, 58k) - Submitted by Arlin Crotts, Professor of Astronomy, Columbia University
- Letter from Alan W. Harris (pdf, 10k) - Submitted by Alan W. Harris
- Response to Beyond LEO (pdf, 26k) - Submitted by Michael Ayres
- Moon on the Way to Mars (doc, 41k) - Submitted by Rob Edmonds
- Changing NASA (doc, 700k) - Submitted by Edgar Zapata
- Feedback (pdf, 46k) - Submitted by Mark Laurent
- Recommendations for the Human Space Flight Committee (pdf, 21k) - Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D.
- Proposal (pdf, 240k) - Submitted by Gary Kitmacher
- Flexibility for EVA Missions (doc, 26k) - Submitted by Thomas A. Sullivan, Ph.D., HEFD Manager for Constellation
- Reflections on Human Space Flight and Science Productivity for the Review of Human Space Flight Committee (pdf, 104k) - Submitted by Dan Lester, Research Fellow University of Texas at Austin
- Space Shuttle Retirement and the Cyrus Space System (wpd, 45k) - Submitted by Daniel Sterling Sample
- Cyrus Spacecraft at Mars image (jpg, 53k) - Submitted by Daniel Sterling Sample
- Provisional pg 1 11-12-08 (jpg, 137k) - Submitted by Daniel Sterling Sample
- Provisional pg 2 11-12-08 (jpg, 187k) - Submitted by Daniel Sterling Sample
- Provisional pg 3 11-12-08 (jpg, 241k) - Submitted by Daniel Sterling Sample
- Provisional Space Platform pg 4 11-12-08 (jpg, 173k) - Submitted by Daniel Sterling Sample

snip
==============================================================
http://www.nasa.gov/offices/hsf/home/index.html
Review of U.S. Space Flight Plans Comittee
Home

http://www.nasa.gov/offices/hsf/related_documents/what-the-committee-is-doing.html
08.14.2009 - Today, Norm Augustine and the committee members met with OSTP and NASA senior management. It was basically a recapitulation and honing of what was presented in the public session on Wednesday, August 12. As we have advertised, this committee was governed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the members took that charge seriously. OSTP/NASA got essentially what the public got on Wednesday. The next step is to prepare the final report which will add more depth and text around what was presented and decided on Wednesday, but it will contain all the same primary messages. Report availability date is TBD.
08.14.2009 - The public meeting on Wednesday went very well, albeit longer than we anticipated. The members fully discussed and deliberated on all the options under consideration for human space flight. They described and discussed the options, the financial considerations for each option, and the evaluation criteria for assessing each option. Then, they down selected the options and discussed all of the evaluation criteria applicable to each option, including scoring them."
08.11.2009 - Tomorrow (August 12) figures to be a major public meeting. If things go according to plan, we will get a presentation on the content, assumptions, and variations of the human space flight options. The options have been refined and fleshed out since last week. Then we should see the Aerospace-led analysis on the cost and schedule of the options. Next, we will hear about the evaluation criteria that will be used to assess each of the options, and then (hopefully) we will agree on the options to be forwarded to NASA/OSTP/OMB for consideration.

snip
==============================================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK

==============================================================

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Moon and Mars - Videos

Loading...
Loading...